
NON-COMPETE Agreement
Jim Clark Co
Protect Your Business Edge: Create non-compete agreements to safeguard sensitive information, define boundaries, and build trust in professional relationships.
Jim Clark Co
This Non-Compete Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into on [Date], by and between:
1. Roles of the Parties:
This Agreement is entered into between [Party 1], who is [describe role, e.g., the franchisor, business owner selling a business, etc.], and [Party 2], who is [describe role, e.g., the franchisee, business purchaser, etc.]. This Agreement is not between an employer and an employee and therefore complies with the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) non-compete rule. The FTC’s non-compete rule prohibits non-compete agreements in employer-employee relationships in most industries. However, this Agreement is valid within the context of [describe the specific business relationship, e.g., franchisor-franchisee relationship, a business-to-business agreement, or the sale of a business].
2. Prohibited Businesses and Activities:
During the term of this Agreement, the Receiving Party agrees not to engage in, manage, operate, or otherwise participate in any business or activity that is substantially similar to or competes with the business of the Disclosing Party.
The following businesses or activities are considered "substantially similar" and are prohibited under this Agreement:
The Receiving Party may engage in businesses or activities that are not substantially similar to those of the Disclosing Party and do not directly compete with the Disclosing Party, as long as such activities do not violate any other terms of this Agreement.
3. Geographic Scope:
The geographic area within which the Receiving Party is prohibited from competing with the Disclosing Party is as follows:
The Receiving Party agrees not to engage in any of the prohibited businesses or activities described in Section 2 within this geographic area during the term of this Agreement.
4. Term of the Agreement:
This Agreement shall remain in effect for a period of [Specify duration, e.g., "two years"] from the date of termination or completion of the business relationship between the Disclosing Party and the Receiving Party.
5. Termination of the Agreement:
Either party may terminate this Agreement under the following circumstances:
Upon termination of this Agreement, the obligations of the Receiving Party regarding non-competition shall cease, unless otherwise specified in the Agreement.
6. Amendments to the Agreement:
This Agreement may be amended only by a written document signed by both parties. Any changes to this Agreement must be discussed and agreed upon before they take effect.
7. Signatures:
By signing below, the parties agree to the terms and conditions outlined in this Non-Compete Agreement.
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, whether written or oral. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
Once upon a time, non-compete agreements were everywhere, tucked neatly into nearly every employment contract, keeping businesses safe from a little something called "unfair competition." But times have changed! Now, everyone’s talking about how these agreements can actually slow people down. Think about it: blocking someone from switching jobs or starting their own thing? Not so great for innovation or the economy. No wonder they’ve come under fire, with some even getting banned outright.
A non-compete agreement (fancy name, right?) is basically a deal where one party—usually the employee—promises not to jump into the same type of work or start a competing business once they part ways with their current employer. It’s like saying, "I won’t steal your thunder for a while after I leave."
Why do companies love these? Well, they want to protect their inside know-how—think trade secrets, confidential info, and those all-important client relationships. It’s their way of keeping the competition at bay while they sleep soundly at night!
Non-compete agreements used to be everywhere—especially in contracts for big-shot executives. But times have changed in a major way.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) shook things up in April 2024 with a game-changing rule: most non-competes are now banned. Why? To boost job mobility, spark innovation, and make it easier for people to start their own businesses. And the best part? The FTC says this could help about 30 million workers.
Under this new rule, any non-competes that already exist are basically toast for most employees. Plus, companies can’t issue new ones to workers at any level—whether you’re the CEO or working an entry-level job—no more non-competes.
In the past, these agreements were mainly reserved for high-level execs with access to all the company’s juicy secrets. But over the years, non-competes started popping up in contracts for lower-wage workers too, which didn’t sit well with people. Before the FTC stepped in, up to 30% of workers might have been locked into these agreements.
It used to be a bit of patchwork—some states, like California, were tough on non-competes, while others let them slide. But with the new federal ban, we’ve got a uniform rule across the country. It’s a whole new world for non-competes!
Non-compete agreements? Yeah, they’re losing their grip in the U.S., and it’s been happening fast. Both the feds and individual states are stepping up to curb their use, especially for low-wage workers and certain industries. Here's a quick rundown of what’s going on:
The push to weaken non-competes is about helping workers move freely and keeping the market competitive. Non-competes can stop people from changing jobs, finding better opportunities, or earning more—plus, they can hold back innovation and slow down economic growth. Policymakers want to keep things dynamic by putting limits on non-competes.
Right now, most non-competes aren’t enforceable for the average worker. Many states have passed laws to ban or restrict them, particularly for lower-wage positions. Even in places where they’re technically allowed, courts are looking at these agreements with a critical eye and often scaling them back if they’re seen as unfair or overly restrictive.
Heads-up: Non-compete laws can still vary depending on where you are, so it’s a good idea to check in with a legal expert to see what’s what in your state.
Even though non-compete agreements are on the decline, there are still a few scenarios where they make sense for a business. But these agreements can’t just be thrown around willy-nilly anymore. They have to be laser-focused, carefully written, and make sense for the situation. So, when might a non-compete still fly? Here’s the lowdown:
In short, non-competes aren’t completely dead, but they’ve got to be used thoughtfully and for the right reasons!
With non-compete agreements becoming harder to enforce, it’s time to get creative. Here are a few solid alternatives that do the job while keeping things fair:
By using these alternatives, you can safeguard your business interests without stifling anyone's career path—it's a win-win!
Pretty sure you're in a situation where a Non-Compete Agreement makes sense, but not sure where to start? Simplify your contract drafting process with Butterscotch's customizable templates! Here's why you'll love us:
Answers to our most asked questions about non-compete agreement templates
Contact us